• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Previous Issues
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Parasitologists United Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 18 (2025)
Volume Volume 17 (2024)
Volume Volume 16 (2023)
Volume Volume 15 (2022)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 14 (2021)
Volume Volume 13 (2020)
Volume Volume 12 (2019)
Volume Volume 11 (2018)
Volume Volume 10 (2017)
Said, D., Khalifa, H., El-Samad, L., Meheissen, M., Diab, H., Diab, R. (2022). The effects of common house fly (Musca domestica) larvaederived substances on wound healing in mouse model. Parasitologists United Journal, 15(3), 283-295. doi: 10.21608/PUJ.2022.169218.1190
Doaa Said; Hoda Khalifa; Lamia El-Samad; Marwa Meheissen; Hala Diab; Radwa Diab. "The effects of common house fly (Musca domestica) larvaederived substances on wound healing in mouse model". Parasitologists United Journal, 15, 3, 2022, 283-295. doi: 10.21608/PUJ.2022.169218.1190
Said, D., Khalifa, H., El-Samad, L., Meheissen, M., Diab, H., Diab, R. (2022). 'The effects of common house fly (Musca domestica) larvaederived substances on wound healing in mouse model', Parasitologists United Journal, 15(3), pp. 283-295. doi: 10.21608/PUJ.2022.169218.1190
Said, D., Khalifa, H., El-Samad, L., Meheissen, M., Diab, H., Diab, R. The effects of common house fly (Musca domestica) larvaederived substances on wound healing in mouse model. Parasitologists United Journal, 2022; 15(3): 283-295. doi: 10.21608/PUJ.2022.169218.1190

The effects of common house fly (Musca domestica) larvaederived substances on wound healing in mouse model

Article 8, Volume 15, Issue 3, December 2022, Page 283-295  XML PDF (1.11 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/PUJ.2022.169218.1190
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Doaa Said1; Hoda Khalifa2; Lamia El-Samad3; Marwa Meheissen4; Hala Diab5; Radwa Diab email 6
1Departments of Medical Parasitology , Alexandria Faculties of Medicine Egypt
2Departments of Histology and Cell Biology , Alexandria Faculties of Medicine1, Egypt
3Departments of Zoology , Alexandria Faculties of Sceince , Egypt
4Departments of Microbiology and Immunology , Alexandria Faculties of Medicine ,Egypt
5Departments of Medical Parasitology , Alexandria Faculties of Medicine ,Egypt
6Departments of Medical Parasitology , Alexandria Faculties of Medicine, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Maggot debridement therapy is a therapeutic wound myiasis that depends mainly on L. sericata
larva. Owing to its availability and cheap breeding, M. domestica was suggested as an alternative to Lucilia.
Objective: The present study was designed to assess the role of M. domestica larvae-derived substances on
wound healing in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mice.
Material and Methods: Chitosan and gut extracts, obtained from M. domestica larvae, were applied daily
on skin wounds of Swiss albino mice. Mice were divided into two groups, control non-treated mice (I), and
experimental treated mice (II). Each group included immunocompetent (a), and immunosuppressed (b) mice.
The experimental subgroups were treated with either chitosan (1) or gut extracts (2). Wounds were assessed
by macroscopic evaluation, wound contracture, histopathological, immunohistochemical and bacteriological
parameters.
Results: In control non treated mice hair growth was evident with normal underlying skin by the end of
the experiment (4 weeks) except in immunosuppressed (Ib) subgroup. Significant reduction in wound size
was detected on the 7th day post wounding (PW) in the immunocompetent-chitosan-treated subgroup (IIa1)
compared to Ia, IIb1, and IIa2 subgroups. Histopathological examination showed early epidermal creeping
on the 3rd day PW in IIa1, IIa2, and IIb2 subgroups. Significant increase in collagen deposition was best
detected in both gut extract-treated subgroups (IIa2 and IIb2) compared to the control subgroups (Ia, and
Ib). Strong immunohistochemical reaction was evident in all immunocompetent treated mice (IIa1 and IIa2)
by the 7th day PW and in IIb2 by the 14th day PW. Delay in keratin maturation was detected in both control
subgroups and IIb1. Significant reduction in staphylococcal colonies was detected by the 7th day PW in all
immunosuppressed treated subgroups compared to their control subgroup (Ib).
Conclusion: The difference in the rapid wound closure as detected by chitosan treatment, and the effective
skin architecting by gut extract treatment recommends further trial by their combined therapy.
Keywords
chitosan; debridement therapy; gut extract; housefly; immunocytokeratin; maggot
Statistics
Article View: 294
PDF Download: 805
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.