• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Previous Issues
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Parasitologists United Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 18 (2025)
Volume Volume 17 (2024)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 16 (2023)
Volume Volume 15 (2022)
Volume Volume 14 (2021)
Volume Volume 13 (2020)
Volume Volume 12 (2019)
Volume Volume 11 (2018)
Volume Volume 10 (2017)
Abou-Gamra, M., Tawfik, R., Nazeer, J., Alkady, S. (2024). Are microscopy and culture enough to diagnose Dientamoeba fragilis: A preliminary study. Parasitologists United Journal, 17(3), 222-226. doi: 10.21608/puj.2024.316334.1267
Maha Abou-Gamra; Rania Tawfik; John Nazeer; Sara Alkady. "Are microscopy and culture enough to diagnose Dientamoeba fragilis: A preliminary study". Parasitologists United Journal, 17, 3, 2024, 222-226. doi: 10.21608/puj.2024.316334.1267
Abou-Gamra, M., Tawfik, R., Nazeer, J., Alkady, S. (2024). 'Are microscopy and culture enough to diagnose Dientamoeba fragilis: A preliminary study', Parasitologists United Journal, 17(3), pp. 222-226. doi: 10.21608/puj.2024.316334.1267
Abou-Gamra, M., Tawfik, R., Nazeer, J., Alkady, S. Are microscopy and culture enough to diagnose Dientamoeba fragilis: A preliminary study. Parasitologists United Journal, 2024; 17(3): 222-226. doi: 10.21608/puj.2024.316334.1267

Are microscopy and culture enough to diagnose Dientamoeba fragilis: A preliminary study

Article 11, Volume 17, Issue 3, December 2024, Page 222-226  XML PDF (388.71 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/puj.2024.316334.1267
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Maha Abou-Gamra; Rania Tawfik; John Nazeer email orcid ; Sara Alkady
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Detection of D. fragilis relies upon microscopic examination of permanently stained fixed
stool smears, and/or culture. Although molecular diagnostic techniques, were developed for several
pathogens, those for D. fragilis are not used routinely.
Objective: To evaluate usefulness of nested PCR in diagnosis of D. fragilis.
Patients and Methods: Fresh stool samples were collected from 100 children aged 6-12 y complaining
of gastrointestinal disturbances. Samples were subjected to microscopic examination of iron hematoxylin
stained smears, culture in Loeffler’s medium and nPCR.
Results: The study detected D. fragilis molecularly in 4% of samples (4/100) and by microscopy and
culture on Loeffler’s medium in 2% (2/100). Molecular assay showed 100% sensitivity and specificity
compared to microscopy (50%, and 95%, respectively), and Loeffler’s culture medium (50%, and 100%
respectively).
Conclusion: Nested PCR offers superior accuracy over microscopy and culture for diagnosis. In cases
where PCR is not accessible in a diagnostic laboratory, at least two alternative diagnostic methods should
be employed.
Keywords
diagnosis; dientamoebiasis; intestinal protozoa; loeffler’s culture; molecular assay; trichomonad
Statistics
Article View: 83
PDF Download: 163
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.