Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Sivas
2
Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health, Department of Microbiology Reference Laboratory and Biological Products, Ankara
3
Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Sivas & Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Sivas , Türkiye
Abstract
Background: Intestinal protozoan infections (IPIs), common all over the world, are an important public
health problem, especially in developing countries. Different diagnostic methods are used for the diagnosis
of causative agents in diarrhea cases.
Objective: This study aims to analyze results of direct microscopy, coproantigen detection test, and PCR
technique in diagnosis of G. intestinalis, E. histolytica/dispar, and Cryptosporidium spp. in stool samples of
patients with diarrhea.
Subjects and Methods: Fresh stool samples were collected from 683 patients complaining of diarrhea,
and simultaneously examined by direct microscopy, commercial rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for detection
of coproantigens, and molecularly using PCR technique.
Results: The overall detection rate of parasites was 3.7% by direct microscopy, 6.6% by RDTs and 2%
by PCR technique. Moderate, and weak fits were recorded between direct microscopy and RDTs results
(Kappa=0.46, P<0.001), and between direct microscopy and PCR technique results (Kappa=0.236,
P<0.001), respectively. No fit (Kappa=0.108, P=0.001) was recorded between coproantigen detection test
and PCR technique results.
Conclusion: It was concluded that direct microscopy and RDTs will be the correct approach in the
first instance in the suspicion of IPIs. Despite high cost of PCR technique, it should be considered in
differentiation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic amoeba, and genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp.
Keywords
)
View on SCiNiTO